Engineering

Section Modulus Calculator

The section's bending-resistance divisor, derived from first principles: I, the extreme fibre, and the S that turns moments into stresses.

Section Modulus Calculator

Results recalculate instantly on every keystroke. Nothing you type is transmitted.

The shape
The dimensions
The section modulus
—
The second moment—
The extreme fibre—
What S is for—

What this result does not account for

  • Gross sections; no slender-element reductions
  • Two shapes — rectangle and circle
● Zero-Server Execution Updated 11 Aug 2026 Reviewed by Marcus Thorne, P.E. IEEE-754 Double Precision

In short: A 100 × 200 mm rectangle carries I = 66,666,666.667 mm⁴ about its strong axis and a section modulus of S = 666,666.667 mm³ — bh³/12 divided by the 100 mm to the extreme fibre, landing on bh²/6. That S is the divisor the bending-stress page consumes: the same moment over twice the modulus is half the stress, which is the whole shopping logic of beam tables.

Formula

I = bh³/12 · πd⁴/64 ··· S = I/c = bh²/6 · πd³/32

The second moment of area prices how far the section's area sits from its bending axis; the modulus divides that by the extreme-fibre distance because stress grows linearly to the surface. Depth enters cubed in I and squared in S — the arithmetic engine behind every deep beam ever chosen over a thick one.

Worked Example

  1. Pick the shape — rectangle or circle.
  2. Enter the bending depth (or diameter).
  3. Read I, c and the modulus S.
  4. Divide your moment by S — that is the bending stress.

Defaults: 100 × 200 rectangle → I 66,666,666.667 mm⁴, S 666,666.667 mm³, c 100.000000 mm. The circle check: d = 100 → I 4,908,738.521 mm⁴, S 98,174.770 mm³ — the same-area circle is the floppier section, which is why masts are not solid rods.

Strengths & Limits Of This Model

Where this engine is strong

  • I, c and S from one entry
  • Both axes' arithmetic shown

Where it stops

  • No rolled-shape database
  • No parallel-axis composites

Risk & accuracy notice. Gross-section property arithmetic. Local buckling, lateral-torsional effects and holes reduce the effective section; codes classify before they trust S. Use for selection and teaching, then let the code check the winner.

Practical Use Cases

Section choice

compare candidates by S

Built-up members

the plate arithmetic

Teaching

why depth is cheap strength

Methodology & Editorial Standards

Computation runs in IEEE-754 double precision at full internal precision; rounding to two decimal places occurs strictly at the display layer, so no cumulative drift enters the result. All monetary outputs use accounting presentation — grouped thousands, two decimals, negatives in parentheses — so figures can be transcribed directly into a model or working paper. Division-by-zero and out-of-domain inputs return an em-dash rather than a misleading number.

This engine was reconciled against an independent reference implementation and hand-verified for the worked example above before release. Our full five-stage review process is published on the About Us page.

Marcus Thorne, P.E. Engineering & Construction Lead · ApexConverter

Chartered structural engineer across structural, fluid and thermal design. Last reviewed: 11 August 2026.

Disclaimer. This calculator is provided for informational and modelling purposes only and does not constitute financial, tax, legal, medical, or engineering advice. Verify all figures with a qualified professional before acting on them.


Section Modulus Calculator — 8 Expert FAQs

8 analyst-written answers to the questions practitioners actually ask — optimised for voice and answer-engine retrieval.

Why is S the number tables boast about?

Because it is the one-divisor summary of bending resistance: stress equals moment over S, so capacity is yield times S. Two sections of identical area can differ in S by multiples, which is exactly the spread between paying for steel and placing it. The tables sort by S so the shopper never has to integrate anything.

Why does depth enter cubed?

Because I integrates area times distance squared, and the rectangle's distance runs to h/2 — the h³ falls out of the integration and one more h drops dividing by c. It is geometry's subsidy for spreading material vertically: every millimetre of depth works harder than the last, up to the buckling and shear limits that eventually object.

Same area, rectangle vs circle — who wins?

The rectangle with its material pushed to the extremes. A 100 × 200 rectangle (area 20,000 mm²) carries S = 666,666.667 mm³; the equal-area circle (d ≈ 159.575 mm) only about 400,000 mm³. Circles are for loads that point in every direction — shafts, poles, masts — not for gravity's single minded downward pull.

Does the modulus know about buckling?

No — and that is its fine print. S prices the fully-effective section; thin flanges and slender walls lose effectiveness by local buckling first, and deep thin beams surrender by lateral-torsional buckling before the outer fibre ever yields. The modulus is the first-order strength; classification and stability are the corrections the codes carry.

Which axis is 'strong'?

The one bending the section resists better — for a rectangle lying flat, the strong axis bends it about its depth. Enter b as the width perpendicular to bending and h as the depth parallel to the load; swap them and the modulus collapses by the aspect ratio, which is precisely how a plank on flat fails where on edge it would have shrugged.

Can I add two rectangles — a flitch or built-up?

Yes, with care: I adds about the COMMON neutral axis, so compute each part's I about the composite centroid (parallel-axis theorem) before summing, then divide by the extreme fibre. Naively adding the parts' own S values undercounts by exactly the lever arms between them — which is the entire point of building up in the first place.

Why is the circle's S πd³/32?

Same recipe as the rectangle: integrate for I — πd⁴/64 — then divide by the extreme fibre d/2, and the quarters cancel to the 32. The circle's symmetry makes every diameter a strong axis, which is its quiet superpower: no wrong way up, at the price of material spread evenly rather than where gravity's bending wants it.

How does S relate to the deflection page?

They are siblings with different parents: S comes from I divided by c and answers strength; deflection uses I directly and answers stiffness. A section can double its S with half the depth change that doubling I needs, so strength problems solve cheaper than deflection problems — the classic reason a beam can pass one page and fail the other.

Related Engineering Engines