Engineering

Heat Exchanger Calculator

Duty over a log mean — Q = U × A × LMTD, with counterflow scored against parallel on the same terminals.

Heat Exchanger Calculator

Results recalculate instantly on every keystroke. Nothing you type is transmitted.

The streams
The hardware
The duty
—
The log mean—
The hot-side flow—
The arrangement card—

What this result does not account for

  • No correction factor — the ideal counterflow/parallel LMTD
  • Constant cp and U across the exchanger
● Zero-Server Execution Updated 11 Aug 2026 Reviewed by Marcus Thorne, P.E. IEEE-754 Double Precision

In short: Hot water falls 80 → 50 °C while cold water rises 20 → 40 °C: the counterflow log-mean difference is 34.760595 °C, and at U = 1,000 W/m²K over 2 m² the duty is 69,521.19 W. Run the same four terminals in parallel and the log mean collapses to 27.905531 °C — about 20% of the duty left on the table, which is why the industry builds counterflow.

Formula

Q = U × A × LMTD; LMTD = (ΔT₁−ΔT₂) ÷ ln(ΔT₁/ΔT₂)

A heat exchanger's driving force changes along its length, so the duty uses the logarithmic-mean of the end differences: counterflow takes ΔT₁ = hot in − cold out and ΔT₂ = hot out − cold in; parallel takes hot-in-vs-cold-in and hot-out-vs-cold-out. The overall coefficient U bundles every film and wall resistance — water-to-water exchangers run 800–1,500 W/m²K. Counterflow's log mean is never smaller than parallel's on the same terminals; that gap is the reason for the plumbing.

Worked Example

  1. Enter the four terminal temperatures from the duty spec.
  2. Enter U for the fluid pair and the transfer area.
  3. Read the duty, the log mean, and what parallel would forfeit.

Defaults: 69,521.19 W over a 34.760595 °C log mean. Drive the area to 10 m² and the duty scales to 347,605.95 W — area is the only linear lever in a nonlinear formula.

Strengths & Limits Of This Model

Where this engine is strong

  • Parallel scored live on the same terminals
  • The hot-side flow derived — the duty gets a plumbing number

Where it stops

  • Multi-pass shells need the F-correction this page omits

Risk & accuracy notice. The log mean is pure arithmetic on your four temperatures; U presets are the published fluid ranges.

Practical Use Cases

Duty checks

will this exchanger carry the load

Terminal design

counterflow vs parallel, priced

Fouling watch

duty falling means U falling

Methodology & Editorial Standards

Computation runs in IEEE-754 double precision at full internal precision; rounding to two decimal places occurs strictly at the display layer, so no cumulative drift enters the result. All monetary outputs use accounting presentation — grouped thousands, two decimals, negatives in parentheses — so figures can be transcribed directly into a model or working paper. Division-by-zero and out-of-domain inputs return an em-dash rather than a misleading number.

This engine was reconciled against an independent reference implementation and hand-verified for the worked example above before release. Our full five-stage review process is published on the About Us page.

Marcus Thorne, P.E. Engineering & Construction Lead · ApexConverter

Chartered structural engineer across structural, fluid and thermal design. Last reviewed: 11 August 2026.

Disclaimer. This calculator is provided for informational and modelling purposes only and does not constitute financial, tax, legal, medical, or engineering advice. Verify all figures with a qualified professional before acting on them.


Heat Exchanger Calculator — 8 Expert FAQs

8 analyst-written answers to the questions practitioners actually ask — optimised for voice and answer-engine retrieval.

Why a logarithmic mean instead of a simple average?

Because the temperature difference decays exponentially along the exchanger — the ends do not contribute equally. The log mean is the constant difference that would transfer the same total heat as the varying one; the arithmetic mean overstates it whenever the end ratios are far apart.

Why does counterflow win?

Because it keeps the temperature profiles sliding in opposition: the coldest cold meets the coldest hot, keeping a difference alive the whole length. Parallel flow's streams converge on a middle temperature and the driving force dies early — on these terminals, 27.9 °C against 34.8 °C of log mean.

What is a typical U?

Water-to-water: 800–1,500 W/m²K. Water-to-oil: 100–600. Gas-to-gas: 10–40. The coefficient collapses every film, wall and fouling layer into one number; when duty drifts down over months, U is the number that moved — fouling, not the formula.

How do I get the flow rates from the duty?

From the energy balance: Q = ṁ · cp · ΔT. The hot side losing 30 °C at 69,523 W moves about 0.55 kg/s of water (cp ≈ 4,186 J/kgK) — the flow card prints it.

What if the end differences are equal?

Then ΔT₁ = ΔT₂ and the log mean is that same value — the formula's limit case. Equal end differences are the thermodynamic sweet spot; the log mean equals the arithmetic mean there and nowhere else.

Can the cold outlet exceed the hot outlet?

In counterflow, yes — it can approach the hot INLET. That crossover is exactly what parallel flow cannot do, and it is why process exchangers that need a tight approach are always counterflow.

Where does effectiveness fit?

Effectiveness is duty over the maximum possible duty — what the exchanger did against what infinite area would do. This page prices the actual duty at the given area and U; effectiveness needs the heat-capacity rates on both sides.

What does fouling do, numerically?

It stacks resistances inside U: a 0.0002 m²K/W fouling layer on both sides of a 1,000 U exchanger can pull the effective U down 20–30%. Duty falls with it, linearly — the log mean never moved.

Related Engineering Engines